What if we could see and interact with the output of the code directly? Why isn’t coding more like drawing a picture? How does it come that traditional tools, like pen and paper, are still the benchmark when it comes to connecting the creator with her piece of work?
What if we could see and interact with the output of the code directly? Why isn’t coding more like drawing a picture? How does it come that traditional tools, like pen and paper, are still the benchmark when it comes to connecting the creator with her piece of work?

Posted 3 months ago & Filed under code, programming, drawing, interactive, 19 notes

Notes:

  1. djibee reblogged this from culturecodechange
  2. studio630 reblogged this from notational
  3. blerchin reblogged this from culturecodechange
  4. sohkatoa reblogged this from fyprocessing
  5. emergentdigitalpractices reblogged this from fyprocessing
  6. rafaelfajardo reblogged this from fyprocessing
  7. roomthily reblogged this from notational
  8. notational reblogged this from lifeandcode
  9. fyprocessing reblogged this from lifeandcode
  10. lifeandcode reblogged this from culturecodechange and added:
    Emanuels Journal: The Tools We Need vs. The Tools We Build.
  11. culturecodechange posted this

About:

Studio630 is the maverick research arm of whatever project we are pursuing. We bring and post the most inspiring articles of work in architecture, urban design, technology, sustainability, open-source, and culture. We are currently stationed at BNIM Architects.

Following:

LIV